|
||||||
|
||||||
|
About the Authors: Dr. Daniel R. Schweers is Superintendent of Schools for the LaSalle-Peru High School District, LaSalle, IL. He can be reached at dschweer@lphs.net. Shawn Harms is the Curriculum Director for the LaSalle-Peru High School District. She can be reached at sharms@lphs.net. Editor's note: This article describes the efforts of a mid-size high school to improve the teaching and learning climate by focusing on staff and student relationships. Through the efforts of students and adults, they are developing the capacity of their school to create a stronger sense of community and develop relationships needed for effective motivation and instruction. La Salle-Peru High School is a stand alone district, so the superintendent may serve a different role than in K-12 districts. "The true measure of progress is not how far one has traveled, but how high were the hills he had to climb." ---Malcolm Forbes | ||||||
|
||||||
|
Background LaSalle-Peru High was a troubled school four years ago when the board of education hired a new superintendent of schools. The board was focused on school improvement and was particularly concerned about declining test scores, below average attendance rates, a high truancy rate, and an increasing dropout rate. The board's hope was that the new superintendent would implement a school-wide improvement program. At that time there was no organized or systematic school improvement activity whatsoever at LaSalle-Peru High School. Furthermore, the curriculum committee, through which new courses and curriculum improvements were typically proposed, had disbanded a couple of years earlier. In addition, by the time the new superintendent arrived, the board and the teachers' union had reached impasse in negotiations and were working with a federal mediator. In the second full week of school the district and its residents endured a seven-day teacher strike. It was into the teeth of this "storm" that the LaSalle-Peru High School Board and its administrators would launch a concerted effort to impact the teaching and learning climate and engage in school improvement. Seven months after the strike, the board approved the creation of a school improvement committee that we called the Internal Review Team (IRT). The IRT would be comprised of faculty, staff, administrators, and, eventually, a member of the board of education. The IRT's mission was simple: Use all available sources of information to examine needs and generate recommendations intended to make LaSalle-Peru High School the best possible place to learn, teach, and work. The IRT, which functioned like a site council, represented a dramatic departure from past practice. The high school had previously been a very traditional school district with a "top-down" style of management and decision-making. Rarely had faculty or staff been empowered to share in making decisions that would have district-wide impact. In essence, the board of education demonstrated its confidence in the staff when the IRT was created. The Internal Review Team Gets to Work The IRT hit the ground running, meeting frequently during the spring and summer of 1999. One of the first things the team did was to conduct a district-wide needs assessment or environmental scan. Accordingly, the IRT interviewed and surveyed parents, senior citizens, local employers, faculty members, and students. IRT members also analyzed data related to attendance rates, test scores, discipline referrals, truancy rates, and dropout rates. The data analysis and surveys identified three predominant school improvement needs: (1) reading, (2) student attendance, and (3) respectful interaction on a school-wide basis. Subsequent to these findings, the IRT established a number of committees and subcommittees, one of which was named simply the "Respect Committee." This article focuses on the work of the respect committee and its effectiveness in building a positive school climate. The Respect Committee researched and brainstormed ideas and initiatives that would create a building-wide climate of mutual respect between and among teachers, administrators, staff, and students. A Review of the Literature The committee learned early in the research process that respect has many aspects and definitions. The bulk of the research they found contained references to intangibles such as caring, positive interactions between teacher and students, and students having positive regard for their fellow students. The committee also found case studies regarding the importance of respect to school culture. Aspects of respect that they researched are listed at the end of this article. The Respect Committee's Recommendations Given the various definitions of respect that the research had revealed, the Respect Committee decided to go back to the stakeholders to identify which aspects of respect they wanted to address. Members of the IRT and the committee interviewed and surveyed teachers, students, and support staff. Committee members also investigated respect initiatives at other schools and talked to colleagues about the best ways to encourage respect in a high school setting. Ultimately, the committee focused on two aspects of respect and engaged in numerous activities to bring about the desired improvement in school climate. The committee decided to focus on (1) demonstrating that we care personally for one another and (2) helping students develop positive regard for one another. Committee members wanted to ensure that encouraging respectful interaction at LaSalle-Peru (L-P) would be a high profile, well-communicated campaign. Huge colorful banners that proclaimed the high school as a "Respect Zone" were hung in hallways throughout the school. Posters were hung in each classroom that read, "LaSalle-Peru promotes the use of respectful communication." The IRT recognized that simply hanging posters would not immediately impact the climate of the school, but they wanted to make a strong statement that the activities they were about to undertake had a purpose. Demonstrate That We Care Personally for One Another The committee discussed how to demonstrate caring for one another in ways that high school students would appreciate. Student committee members recommended that every employee and student receive a special birthday card on his or her birthday and that birthdays be announced during morning announcements. In a school of 1,300 students and 175 employees, organizing this would be no small task. However, the committee members felt it was very important to demonstrate that each stakeholder was a valued member of the L-P learning community. Each month a birthday party was held during lunch hour for those who had celebrated their birthday that month. In addition, students in an alternative education program designed the special birthday cards. These students were thrilled to be able to contribute to the respect campaign. Another valuable but unanticipated respect intervention was actually a by-product of the interviews the committee members conducted with support staff employees. Committee members were surprised and concerned when they learned that a significant division existed between certified and support staff. This led the committee to recommend an on-going team-building effort. In the spring of 2001, all employees participated in a team-building staff development workshop led by an outside facilitator. Employee evaluations at the conclusion of this activity were overwhelmingly positive. Staff development is part of the on-going school improvement process, and each institute day focuses on some aspect of school improvement. One of the early signs that the school climate was getting healthier was when students approached the administration and asked for a formal way to give their input to adults in the school. The students proposed creating a communication committee whereby student representatives would have an opportunity to meet monthly with the building principal. The agenda, set by the representatives, would consist of issues of interest to the students. Knowing that listening and responding to other's concerns is a sign of respect (Scherer, 1998, p. 10), the IRT was eager to help form the committee. The Communication Committee was formed with representatives from all four grades, representatives from all extra-curricular groups, and representatives of students who are not involved in extra-curricular activities. The committee members have done an exceptional job of maintaining the respect theme throughout all of their interactions with school personnel. Initially, some of their concerns were typical "kid concerns," but as little issues were resolved and trust grew between students and adults, their suggestions became more substantial. Recently, the Communication Committee requested that the school help develop a way for students to be involved in some kind of voluntary service program. Some truly great ideas have been implemented as a direct result of Communication Committee discussions with the principal. As a consequence, even the students feel empowered to initiate school improvement measures. Finally, the committee also recommended that students who were assigned to in-school suspension be provided positive life skills instruction with an emphasis on respect. Prior to this suggestion, students simply worked on homework assignments when they were suspended from class. The members of the committee felt it was important that these students have an opportunity to learn to interact more successfully and to feel more empowered. The student assistance director, social workers, and the counselors used teaching materials that taught students about dealing with aggression, peer mediation, problem solving, and learning strategies. The Internal Review Team is currently working on instructional components of teaching aspects of respect. Increase Positive Recognition for Personal Achievement of Students One of the more powerful respect initiatives is the "L-P's Most Wanted" program, which is a takeoff on the old "Catch 'em Bein' Good" program with an interesting technology component. Essentially, teachers are encouraged to spot students doing something especially nice or helpful for another member of the L-P learning community. Then the teacher issues that student a special ticket indicating that the student has been caught being good. Later the student's picture, name and good deed are posted on the school's website, www.lphs.net. The "L-P's Most Wanted" portion of the website is updated each month. Finally, the name of every student who'd been issued a ticket that month is entered into a drawing for various prizes. One of the most popular prizes a student can win is one month's use of a prime parking space. The "L-P's Most Wanted" initiative proved highly motivational for students. Last but certainly not least, the committee recommended that students be recognized for a broader variety of activities and accomplishments and be recognized more frequently. As an example, students with excellent attendance were recognized. In fact, for the first time ever, an L-P student was recognized for four years of perfect attendance. Previously, student recognition was based solely on academic factors such as grade point average. Students greatly appreciated being recognized for accomplishments other than grades. The staff was only too happy to increase student recognition for good attendance and positive interaction with others because these behaviors have a direct impact on teaching and learning. As can be seen, the Respect Committee's recommendations were comprehensive and wide-ranging, impacting virtually every member of the L-P learning community. Summary The two areas of respect that the Respect Committee identified, demonstrating caring on a personal level and increasing positive recognition for students, have made a powerful impact on the school climate at LaSalle-Peru High School. In addition, the process of school improvement itself created a sense of power for students and staff alike. The aspects of the school improvement process that were most transforming included:
High schools, in particular, may shy away from affective goal areas because they are hard to measure and document. However, our experience has demonstrated that when the goal is aligned with a real need and the whole school community is focused on making a difference, you can succeed beyond your wildest dreams. Schools in turmoil-beleaguered by impasse, strikes, strife, and top-down decision-making-can benefit from an engaging school improvement process more than they know. Epilogue It's now been two years since the Internal Review Team and the Respect Committee began to address school climate at L-P High School. We are pleased to report that the early returns are extremely encouraging. In fact, all of the typical quality school indicators have improved greatly since the IRT and the Respect Committee initiated their school improvement efforts. Reading, which was another goal area, has shown authentic improvement. Seventy percent of L-P students exceeded the state's reading standards in 1999 and 77% exceeded the state standards in 2000. In addition, this past year students posted the highest average ACT score, 22.6, in the history of the school district. Perhaps even more important and impressive are the intangible benefits that LaSalle-Peru stakeholders have realized as a consequence of these school improvement efforts. There simply is no way to quantify the satisfaction our educators feel when students thank them for implementing the respect initiatives described in this article. Additionally, people inside and outside the school community frequently comment on the respectful behavior our students demonstrate. There also appears to have been a rebirth among the majority of the district's employees and a sincere commitment to making LaSalle-Peru the best possible place to learn, teach, and work. Employees feel empowered and generate new and exciting ideas everyday. In view of where the district was just three years ago, the transformation has been nothing short of remarkable. Schools in the throes of tough times should take heart from the LaSalle-Peru High School experience. School improvement can work and must be a priority, even during the toughest of times.
References Cotton, K. (1993, April). Building positive student self-concept. Northwest Regional Education Laboratory: School Improvement Research Series, pp. 1-12. Habel, J., Bloom, L. A., Ray, M. S., & Bacon, E. (1999, March). Consumer reports: What students with behavior disorders say about school. Remedial and Special Education, pp. 1-22. Heath, D. H. (2000, March 15). Psychological bars to school improvement. Education Week on the Web, pp. 1-5. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (1990, April). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis/1990 Update. Peterson, K. D., & Deal, T. E. (1998). How leaders influence the culture of schools. Educational Leadership Abstracts, 56(1), 28-30. Remboldt, C. (1998). Making violence unacceptable. Educational Leadership Abstracts, 56(1), 32-38. Scherer, M. (1998). The discipline of hope: a conversation with herb kohl. Educational Leadership Abstracts, 56(1), 8-13. Sapon-Shevin, M., Dobbelaere, A., Corrigan, C., Goodman, K., & Mastin, M. (1998). Everyone here can play. Educational Leadership Abstracts, 56(1), 42-45. Wallis, C. S. (1998, February 11). Waging a war on incivility. Education Week on the Web, pp. 1-5. Wilson, B. L., & Corcoran, T. B. (1988). Successful secondary schools. New York: Falmer Press. Youngerman, S. (1998). The power of cross-level partnerships. Educational Leadership Abstracts, 56(1), 58-60.
All material on this site © 2000-08 NCA Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement unless otherwise noted. Questions may be directed to the Webmaster (webmaster@ncacasi.org). |
||||||