![]() |
NCA CASI e-News The Numbers Game Volume 2 Number 2 |
|
About e-News:
The Numbers Game Excerpted and adapted with permission from: Dusseau, Hurst, and Bitter, "The Numbers Game" Principal Leadership, September 2003, p. 49-54. Principal Leadership is a publication of the National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP). For more information concerning NASSP services and/or programs, please call (703) 860-0200, or visit http://www.principals.org. For the full article visit http://www.ncacasi.org/documents/assess_game_prin_leader.pdf. What Game Are You Going to Play? An early consideration in the assessment game is to be clear about what
you plan to measure. Before a valid and productive assessment program
is developed, you need to know what game you are playing - the cohort
growth game or the program growth game?
Assessing program growth yields different information than cohort growth and may be easier for educators to design, implement, and understand at the school level. Educators often complain that many of the outcomes for which they are held accountable are beyond their control. Educators don't control the ability levels, numbers, family backgrounds, level of parental support, or native languages of the students who come to their classrooms. In other words, educators do not control the cohort. Conversely, what happens within the classroom - the educational program - is largely under the control and influence of educators. The educational experiences the students engage in, the teaching techniques used, the timing and pace of the curriculum, and how learning is practiced and reinforced are largely controlled by the instructor. Program growth focuses on the impact of these variables. What are the Rules of the Game? School accredited by the North Central Association Commission on Accreditation
and School Improvement [NCA CASI] have been focusing on program growth
measures for the last fifteen years as part of performance based accreditation.
While implementing this protocol, NCA CASI has identified some rules of
the game that we call Green Light and Red Light Conditions.
After you have determined exactly what you want to measure and considered the rules for evaluating your assessments, how will you know if you are truly improving? Two major issues come to mind: 1) multiple assessments provide a more comprehensive picture of student performance and 2) interpretation of results from multiple assessments requires the use of specific statistical tools. Use Multiple Assessments. Bernhardt, in her book Data Analysis for Comprehensive School Improvement, advocates that ". . . multiple measures must be considered and used to understand the multifaceted world of school from the perspective of everyone involved. . ." (1998, p.13). Sergiovanni (2000) recommends multiple assessments that reflect both state and local standards. The conclusion is that we must rely on more than one source of data to substantiate that student performance, in the overall sense, is improving. Convert Results to Standard Scores. If a person accepts the premise that multiple measures are preferable over a single assessment, then the "game" gets complicated. If one assessment uses percentile scores as a metric and another uses raw scores, how can both assessment results be used and compared? One relatively simple answer to this problem is to compare standard scores, or z scores. Simply defined; "a z score is expressed as units of standard deviation above or below the mean" (McMillan, p. 116). By determining the difference between a pre-test z score and a post-test z score, we can measure the growth in standard deviations-a "common denominator" for statistics. This difference is known as effect size, or the magnitude of change. Calculating z scores and effect size is a relatively simple task. There are several software packages available that can calculate effect size simply and quickly. Most statistics textbooks provide tables that allow standard scores to be calculated with little stress. Even after data are converted to standard units, a major question remains: Is the growth worth mentioning? Armstrong (2002) conducted a multi-year study of 600 NCA CASI accredited schools that used adapted standard scores to measure the results of their school improvement activities. Based on that study, Armstrong concluded that an effect size or standard unit growth of 0.3 was indicative of substantial growth, growth of .2 to .29 standard units was considered good, and growth of .1 to .19 standard units was worth mentioning. Declines in performance were defined by the same scale. Readers should realize that effect size (or standard unit growth) is a subjective term and should be defined in the context of the study. The decision to document program growth, cohort growth, or both should be based on an honest representation of the data in context rather than being based on pressure to achieve a "winning score." If the assessment design was compromised, the final score lacks meaning and credibility. Finally, the use of standard scores allows for accurate interpretation of multiple assessment results, thus reducing dependency on single "high stakes" assessments. As in all sports, there is more to this assessment game than the final score. Dusseau, Hurst, and Bitter are staff members at NCA CASI. To read
their full article and see the list of references, please visit http://www.ncacasi.org/documents/assess_game_prin_leader.pdf.
Resources - Useful Data Analysis Resources NCA CASI Software Multiple Measures: Accurate Ways to Assess Student Achievement Essential Assessment Concepts for Teachers and Administrators Data Analysis For Comprehensive Schoolwide Improvement The Memory Jogger for Education: A Pocket Guide of Tools for Continuous
Improvement in Schools Commission Corner NCA CASI District Accreditation Demonstration Sites Three districts have been selected as demonstration sites for implementation of NCA CASI's new District Accreditation. They are: - Cuba Independent Schools, Cuba, NM The districts will be receiving in-depth training on system improvement throughout the year. As they gain experience in the district accreditation framework, they will become the "go to" districts when new districts have questions. To learn more about District Accreditation, visit http://www.ncacasi.org/standard/district or attend a District Accreditation Orientation workshop (see dates in the Professional Development section). Just a reminder for accredited schools: The demographic portion of the
NCA CASI Annual Report is due during the October-November timeframe for
all elementary, middle level, secondary, unit, college preparatory, and
adult/vocational accredited schools. Special purpose and postsecondary
schools complete their reports later in the year on a different timeline.
Following, please find a list of deadlines for each state.
We want your feedback! How can we assist you through enhanced assessment services? We want to help you use assessment instruments and data effectively and appropriately, and help you link NCA CASI accreditation, state, and federal assessment requirements. Please take a few minutes to complete the brief assessment survey. Your assistance will be greatly appreciated. Annual Meeting Notes Join us for three days of discussion, exploration, and sharing of practices and processes that result in improved student learning. Listen to keynote speaker, Dr. Lorraine Monroe of the Lorraine Monroe Leadership Institute share "How to Create Effective Schools for All Children." Join Tom Guskey, university professor and assessment expert, as he shares tips for using research in efforts to close the achievement gap. Choose from more than 100 practitioner-led breakout sessions as well as several in-depth seminars designed to provide you with proven strategies for raising student achievement at the classroom, building, and system levels. Visit http://www.ncacasi.org/event/meeting to find out more. Upcoming Professional Development To find out more information or to register for the following workshops, visit http://www.ncacasi.org/eventsandtraining.
Start the New Year in the School Improvement Specialist Program!
How to Reach Us We are committed to providing you with the information you need to continually improve student learning. Please share with us your suggestions, advice, and ideas on how to make e-News and our other products and services best meet your needs. Send us feedback at enews@ncacasi.org. Thank you for reading this issue of NCA CASI e-News. To see a copy of this newsletter on-line or to view past issues of e-News, go to http://www.ncacasi.org/enews/index. Please report problems to enews@ncacasi.org. North Central Association |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thank
you for reading this issue of NCA e-NEWS. Events and dates are subject
to change. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright
© 2003 North Central Association Commission on Accreditation and
School Improvement. All Rights Reserved
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||